
This heartbreak is known only to enterprise founders.
It happens when you run a flawless pilot. The technology and implementation worked. The customers loved it. The accuracy was high, the latency was invisible, and your engineering and pre-sales teams rang the bell, ready to pass the baton to Customer Success. You proved your product works.
And then... nothing happens.
Weeks turn into months. Email response from your champion slows down. Momentum freezes. You have entered Pilot Purgatory.
The pilot was a "technical success" but a "commercial failure."
In my time at Microsoft and now building Nedl Labs, I have learned that startups rarely die because their technology fails during a pilot. They die because they treated the pilot as a science experiment (Does it work?) rather than a commercial operation (Will you buy it?).
In the enterprise, especially in high-stakes sectors like healthcare, a successful pilot does not guarantee a contract. Specifically in today's AI world, where every enterprise has carved off "innovation budgets" for AI pilots, securing a pilot is easier than ever. But converting it is harder.
A real contract requires Line of Business (LOB) budget, security & AI clearance, legal review, and executive air cover.
The "Innovation budget" funds experiments; the LOB budget funds production.
If you wait until the pilot is over to start bridging that gap, you are already too late.
Most founders start a pilot with a vague goal: "Let's see if this creates value."
This is a trap. "Value" is subjective. Subjectivity kills deals.
At Nedl Labs, we define a Pilot Success metric before the scope is finalized. We embed specific, quantitative, measurable metrics directly into the pilot proposal itself.
This transforms the proposal from a simple scope of work into a binding document that answers one binary question:
"If we hit Metrics X, Y, and Z, does this trigger a contract?"
If the customer is hesitant to define these metrics, do not start the pilot. It is a massive red flag that they are operating with "Innovation Budget" (Tourist Money) and have no bridge to the "LOB Budget" (Real Money) required for production.
The Criteria must be specific:
When you define the endpoint, the pilot ceases to be an experiment. It becomes a conditional close.
The biggest killer of deal velocity is the Sequential Fallacy.
Founders typically think linearly: Step 1: Pilot. Step 2: Legal/Security Review. Step 3: Contract.
In enterprise healthcare, Step 2 is a 3- to 6-month black hole. If you wait for the pilot to finish before handing your SOC2 report to their InfoSec team, you have introduced a massive "air gap" where momentum dies.
You must run the administrative track parallel to the technical track.
While your engineers are integrating the API, your COO should be:
Tell your champion: "We are confident this pilot will succeed. To ensure no service interruption when we switch to production, let's get the paperwork out of the way now."
First, a cardinal rule: Never agree to a free pilot.
"Free" anchors your value to zero. It signals that you are desperate for data rather than confident in your solution. More importantly, financial commitment is a proxy for organizational priority.
If a stakeholder hasn't spent political capital to get budget approval, they won't fight for you when internal blockers arise.
Do not treat the pilot as a "free sample" where the price is a mystery to be revealed later. That is a recipe for sticker shock.
If your solution generates $1M in value but the buyer has only allocated a $50k budget for a tool, you are walking into a dead end. You need to identify that mismatch before you invest a single engineering cycle.
We drop a Commercial Anchor during the initial pilot setup:
"Based on the scope of this pilot, a full production rollout will cost approximately $X/year. Does that align with your budget expectations, assuming the pilot hits its metrics?"
If they balk at the price now, you have saved yourself a quarter of wasted effort. If they agree, you have effectively negotiated the contract before the pilot even begins.
Your day-to-day contact, your champion, helps you to navigate the customer org, but they are rarely your buyer. If you remain single-threaded through them, you are invisible to the person who actually controls the P&L.
We require an Executive Steering Committee alignment for every pilot.
This doesn't have to be a recurring 30-minute meeting that gets repeatedly rescheduled. It is a high-signal communication loop, whether a 15-minute sync or a structured executive summary email, delivered every two weeks specifically to the Executive Sponsor (VP or C-level).
The communication protocol is strict and binary:
This routine conditions the executive to view the pilot as a pre-contract phase, not a standalone project. When the pilot ends, the budget holder isn't surprised—they are waiting for the invoice.
The most dangerous moment in a deal is the "Pilot End Date."
In physics, static friction is stronger than kinetic friction. If you let the pilot come to a halt, you need a lot of activation energy to restart the momentum.
Never let the pilot "end."
Instead, frame the conclusion as a "Milestone Review." If you hit the specific criteria defined in Step 1, the service does not turn off. The data pipes stay open. The users keep logging in.
Your pilot agreement should include an Auto-Conversion Clause:
"Upon successful completion of the Success Criteria, this agreement automatically converts to a 12-month commercial term unless written notice is provided 14 days prior."
Default to yes. Design the contract so they have to exert effort to turn you off, rather than requiring them to exert effort to keep you on.
We are builders at heart. We optimize for accuracy, latency, and uptime. But as founders, we must realize that the most crucial system we are building isn't just the code, it's the revenue engine.
Our job isn't just to prove feasibility (that it works); it is to engineer inevitability (that they must buy it).
A pilot is not a casual test drive. It is the first month of a five-year partnership.
If you treat it like a sandbox, they will treat it like a toy.
Architect the deal with the same rigor you architect the product. That is how you escape purgatory.

Founder nēdl Labs | Building Intelligent Healthcare for Affordability & Trust | X-Microsoft, Product & Engineering Leadership | Generative & Responsible AI | Startup Founder Advisor | Published Author





